top of page
Search

(February 3) Pûkpui, a village of some 2,200 inhabitants in southern Mizoram, lies several kilometers to the north of the state’s second largest city of Lunglei (population 190,000) and boasts a history that long predates the British colonial presence in the Mizo Hills. Courage and valour in battle are an integral part of it. In the mid-19th century, the chieftain of Pûkpui, Seipuia, commanded the loyalty of two famed warriors in Mizo history, one of whom, Chawngbâwla, is prominently interred on a hilltop of the village. And in the post-colonial era, Laldenga, the father of Mizo nationalism, was born in Pûkpui.


At the head of the Mizo National Front, Laldenga led an independence movement that took up arms in 1966 on behalf of Mizoram’s secession from India. In the bitter warfare that followed, Lunglei was the one major population center captured by the MNF. Although it was subsequently retaken by the Indian army, and Pukpui was razed to the ground before being rebuilt in 1973, the MNF rebellion was a partial success that led to the eventual granting of statehood to Mizoram within the Indian federal union.


Pûkpui derives its name from the great number of puk or caves in its hills. Many of these have been sealed over time, it being a traditional belief that demons afflict whoever ventures into them. A more probable explanation is that the lack of oxygen in the caves’ inner reaches causes hallucinations that have been assumed to be supernaturally induced. In former times, indeed, groups of Mizo men, their numbers depleting the oxygen level even further, would penetrate deep into such caves as a demonstration of their virility,


During a week that I recently spent with Pûkpui’s small B’nei Menashe community, I heard more than one story about the visions of the intrepid cave explorers of old. One of these was had by a foreigner, James Herbert Lorrain, an early Baptist missionary to the Mizo Hills known to Mizos as Pu Buanga. While in a cave in Leite, to the east of Pûkpui, he is said to have fallen asleep in a puk and dreamed that the people to whom he had come to bring Christianity were of Israelite descent but that he must keep this knowledge a secret lest it lead to their refusal to accept the Christian faith. Whether true or not, such a story helps explain the reluctance of the first British missionaries to speak publicly about the seeming traces of biblical traditions in the native religion they sought to uproot.


Yet another vision, dating to shortly before the missionaries’ arrival, was supposedly had by a local seer named Dârphâwka at Dârkhuang Tlâng or “Gong Mountain,” a dramatically shaped peak located in the vicinity of Pûkpui.

Darkhuang Tlang.

Having supposedly seen in it that “there will be a fair-skinned people who will come from across the sea,” Dârphâwka reportedly told the people of Pûkpui. “Pay heed to what they will have to say to you.” When the British came to the area with their troops and missionaries not long afterwards, this vision was widely taken to refer to them -- and in fact, when the earliest Baptist ministers began evangelizing in the Mizo Hills, it was in Pûkpui that they made their first converts to Christianity.

Ever since then, the Baptist Church has had a stronghold in the southern region of Mizoram, whereas the Presbyterians have been dominant in the north. One of the B’nei Menashe families that I met while in Pûkpui is still one-quarter Baptist. While its Jewish component, consisting of Merabi Khupchawng and her two daughters Tamar and Gabriella, have severed their association with Christianity, Merabi’s husband Lalthangliana has remained an Elder of the local Baptist congregation.


Born Lalbiakzami,Merabi took the biblical name of King David’s wife Merav (Mirab in the King James Bible) when she took up the practice of Judaism in 2018, adding to it the Mizo female gender suffix “i.” Convinced by their reading of the Hebrew Bible, the Christian “Old Testament,” of Judaism’s truth, even though they were told that it was a “dead religion,” she and her mother were the first in Pûkpui to adopt it. Although they were subsequently successful in getting five other village families to join them, Lalthangliana was not among the persuaded. At the outset, Merabi told me, she tried her utmost to make him change his mind, just he tried his best to get her to remain a Christian.

Merabi lighting Hanukkah candles with daughters.

But though neither wanted to live in a religiously mixed home, neither was able to prevail, and in the end, caring too much for each other and for their daughters to separate, they agreed to respect each other’s decision and stay together.


Somewhat ironically, given the fact that he has no sons, Lalthangliana’s main problem with Judaism, as far as I was able to gather in talking to him, was less its rejection of the divinity of Jesus than its insistence on male circumcision, which he takes to be a backsliding from the “spirituality” of the New Testament. And yet his Christian faith has also given him the belief that religious observance that derives from compulsion is of little value and that at the end of the day sincerity and authenticity are paramount in matters of faith. “We decided,” he told me, “that my wife and daughters would do their own thing religiously and I would do mine.”

This is unusual for Mizo society, in which a woman is expected to follow her husband’s wishes obediently, especially in matters that are considered to be situated in the public domain, of which religion affiliation is one. Even if they belong to different denominations of the same faith, it is thought to be a woman’s duty upon marriage to leave her denomination for her husband’s. a sentiment well-reflected in the old Mizo proverb, Hmeichhia leh chakai in sakhua an nei lo, “a woman and a crab have no religion of their own.”

This has been the attitude toward her, Merabi told me, of Pûkpui’s Baptists as a whole, who unlike her husband have never stopped trying to get her and her daughters to return to the Christian fold. The argument they have most resorted to, she says, one traditionally used in Mizoram to get non-Christian holdouts to submit, has to do with death and bereavement. Mizo culture has always attributed great importance to being properly buried and mourned, and in a close-knit village in which participation in mourning is a sign of communal solidarity, the absence of one’s neighbors at such a time is particularly painful. Merabi has often been asked by the Baptist Elders of Pûkpui to consider the grim prospect that, should she continue to cling to Judaism, no Christian clergyman will eulogize her or preside at her funeral. “I tell them,” she says with a calm determination, “that I don’t need a Christian clergyman. I have my fellow Jews for that. And if there aren’t enough of them in Pûkpui, I’m sure they’ll come from Aizawl [Mizoram’s capital in which most of its B’nei Menashe reside] to do the honors.”


She has steadfastly stood her ground. If anything, she says, the pressure on her has grown more intense as pandemic-induced fears of death and its spiritual reckoning have become greater in Pûkpui. Yet recently, despite Lalthangliana’s pleas that she not do so, she took the final step of formally requesting the removal of her and her daughters’ names from Pûkpui’s Baptist registry. To herself, her daughters, and her husband, as well as to her neighbors and relatives, this is her declaration that she will never consider turning back from her journey to Judaism.


Asaf Rentlei

(This is the first of a two-part series)



Updated: Jan 27, 2022

A Degel Menashe Editorial


“I urge you to contact the relevant authorities so that they will investigate the matter thoroughly,” Michael Freund writes to Sarah Baite in his letter to her, parts of which are quoted from in today’s Newsletter. Is this his idea of black humor? Even as Shavei Israel’s chairman urges Sarah Baite to press for legal justice, Shavei Israel’s Manipur administrator Sehjalal Kipgen gets thugs to threaten her that she had better do no such thing. And what has Michael Freund done about it? As far as can be determined, nothing at all.


Freund writes Baite: “If you require any assistance, legal or otherwise, we would be willing to help you.” Degel Menashe cannot answer Freund’s letter for Baite, who cannot answer for herself right now because she has gone into hiding due to the threats she has received. When she feels it is safe to emerge, she will have to decide what if any “assistance” she wishes to ask for. Meanwhile, however, we do have a suggestion. If Michael Freund wishes to show that he’s serious – and frankly, it’s hard to believe that he is – he can start immediately by doing one thing.


It’s a simple one, Michael: get rid of Sehjalal Kipgen. Demand his resignation -- dismiss him – fire him – tell him to make himself scarce: you can call it what you want. Whatever you call it, it is obscene for you to be offering Sarah Baite aid and sympathy when a high official in the organization that you head, the man in charge of its activities in the state of Manipur in which Baite lives, is doing everything he can to scare her back into the silence she has had the courage to cast aside. As long as you let this man remain in office, you make a mockery of every supposedly concerned word that you write to her or about her.


So how about it? It wouldn’t take much: just a little announcement that from this moment on, Sehjalal Kipgen’s employment at Shavei Israel is terminated. Doing this will not give Shavei Israel a clean bill of health. Far from it. But in cleaning anything up, it’s best to begin by removing the darkest stain.


(January 27) Shavei Israel chairman Michael Freund, our Newsletter has learned, has written a letter to Sarah Baite. The letter comes after several weeks in which the publicizing of the 2016 rape of Baite’s daughter by a Shavei Israel crony in Manipur has been sending shock waves through the B’nei Menashe community.


Dated January 21, 2022, Freund’s letter reached Baite three days later, having apparently been emailed to a Shavei Israel operative in Manipur and dropped off at her home by an anonymous courier. Its full text is in our Newsletter’s possession. It began:


“Dear Mrs. Baite,

“The other day I received a copy of a letter you had sent [the reference is to a 2018 appeal addressed by Baite to Israel’s Minister of Aliyah and Absorption Pnina Tamano-Shata] containing serious allegations about the shocking sexual assault on your daughter in July 2016.

Shavei Israel chairman, Michael Freund.

This is the first time that I have heard of these accusations, and they are simply horrifying. I urge you to contact all the relevant authorities so that they will investigate the matter thoroughly.”


As pointed out on this site [See our January 23 article “’This Is the First Time I have Heard of These Allegations: Is He To Be Believed?”], Freund’s claim never to have heard until now of the case of Sarah Baite and her daughter strains credulity. Evidently written to deflect mounting pressure on himself and Shavei Israel to explain their long-standing silence regarding the rape incident, his letter continued:


“As a parent myself, I cannot imagine how difficult and painful such an experience must have been, and my heart goes out to you and your family. If you require any assistance, legal or otherwise, we would be willing to help you. I tried several times to speak to you by phone and via other Bnei Menashe community members but have been unable to reach you.”


It is unclear what “several times” Freund had in mind. Before going into temporary hiding this week (see today’s article “Sarah Baite Leaves Churachandpur”), Baite, whose cell phone number is known to Shavei Israel, told our Newsletter that no attempted calls by Michael Freund were recorded on her phone and that the only calls she has received from Shavei officals were the threatening ones of the organization’s Manipur administrator Shlomo Sejalal Kipgen. (See our January 23 article) “Sarah Baite Files Rape Charges In Face of Shavei Intimidation.”

Sarah Baite.

From there, Freund’s letter proceeded to the subject, also raised by Baite in her appeal to Tamano-Shata, of her being denied Aliyah bv Shavei Israel. He wrote:


“I can assure you that no one from Shavei Israel has blocked your Aliya or removed you from any Aliya list. The fact is that the last time that a rabbinical delegation visited Manipur to make an Aliya list was in November 2015, which was 8 months before the incident with your daughter. We checked the list of Bnei Menashe to be interviewed by the rabbis in 2015 which was prepared by the Bnei Menashe community leadership at the time, and your name was never on it, so it cannot possibly have been removed at a later date.


“Shavei Israel does not decide who makes Aliya. This decision is entirely in the hands of the Chief Rabbinate and the Government of Israel. If it were up to us, all the Bnei Menashe would have been in Israel already! It is regrettable that certain people have led you to think otherwise.”


“What is regrettable,” says Degel Menashe executive director Yitzhak Thangjom, “is that Michael Freund, in typical fashion, totally distorted Sarah Baite’s letter to Pnina Tamano-Shata. Nowhere in it did Baite say that she had been removed from an Aliyah list. She said that, despite her many years in the B’nei Menashe community and her difficult situation as a widow with three children, she had never been invited to an Aliyah interview that might have placed her on such a list, as had been many people with less seniority in the community than hers. I find it hard to believe that Michael Freund actually read her letter to the minister.”


As for Freund’s claim that Shavei Israel does not decide who makes Aliyah, Thangjom declared, “it’s simply laughable. Every B’nei Menashe knows that the Aliyah lists are drawn up by Shavei after preliminary interviews conducted by it and that the Rabbinate then re-interviews the candidates who pass. Neither the Rabbinate nor the Israeli government are empowered to add a single person to the first-round list. Both can in principle take names off the list, though they have rarely done so in practice, but they never add any new names. That has been Shavei’s exclusive prerogative.”


On the same day that Freund’s letter to Sarah Baite was written, he posted a Facebook announcement to the B’nei Menashe community, much of it framed in the same language as the letter’s. In it he reiterated his prior ignorance of the rape incident and requested that anyone knowing about it send him “a full and detailed account [of it] as soon as possible.”


“And this,” commented Thangjom, “at the very time that Shavei Israel’s administrator in Manipur, Shlomo Sehjalal Kipgen, has been threatening Sarah Baite withdraw her complaint to the police! How can Michael Freund expect to be taken seriously?”


B’nei Menashe Facebook reactions to Freund’s posting were mixed, with some discussants attributing the uproar over the rape case to a Degel Menashe attempt to undermine Shavei Israel and others angrily answering back. “I am fed up with this rape story,” wrote Yosef Khayim Menashe.

And Avidan Menashe wrote: “I feel bad for them [Sarah Baite and her daughter]. But then again, it is never good to bring back the past. It’s unfortunate that this [Sarah Baite’s] family is now being used by an organization to bring down another organization. They should have fought this case when it happened, five or six years ago. [Editor’s note: Degel Menashe was founded in December 2019.] If they’re only bringing up this matter now, they obviously do not have good intentions.”


To which Yonatan Haokip of Sderot replied:


“Just because it happened a long time ago doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be brought up now. Should God, by the same logic, forgive all sins after six years? She [Sarah Baite’s daughter] has been hurt very badly. It’s nothing to make light of.”


And Eliora Mate of Bet-She’an added:


“It’s unacceptable that such things should happen and just as much so that people should be angry at its being dredged up from the past. If it had happened in their own family, I’m sure they would have reacted violently. It’s selfish to think that other people should learn to bear pain that we ourselves would never agree to put up with. And what hurts even more is that this happened in our own Jewish community.”









SHARE YOUR STORY. SEND US A LETTER.

CONTACT US

Isaac Thangjom, Project Director

degelmenashe@gmail.com

CONNECT WITH US
  • YouTube
  • facebook (1)
SUBSCRIBE

© 2020 DEGEL MENASHE

bottom of page